IVa – Gender

Nouns are divided into two grammatically distinct categories:

NEUTER nouns
refer to “non‐persons” (animals, ideas, inanimate objects)
refer to “persons” (male and/or female) – in some other languages this category is known as “Common gender”.

Although these categories are referred to as “genders”, the semantic dividing line between them is a question of personhood, not sex (bulls are “neuter”, eunuchs are “epicene”), and is entirely predictable (not, as for Spanish or German genders, largely arbitrary).  Just to make sure things are clear, all the nouns in the lexicon (see XII, XIII) are specifically labelled as either “E(picene)” or “N(euter)”.

A noun's gender naturally makes a difference to the pronouns that refer back to that noun (“it” or “he/she”), but gender also determines the pronoun‐suffixes that attach to associated verbs, postpositions, or “possession” nouns (see VIc), and the pattern of its case‐endings (below).

IVb – Case

Nouns and pronouns (along with their accompanying adjectives) signal their role in a sentence partly just by obeying word‐order rules (see IXa), but also by means of case‐marking suffixes.  To take a classic example sentence, saiók kua·da ilunsu·es means “a dog bites a man” (literally, “dog man bites”).  In English, rearranging the words is enough to change the meaning and produce a much better news item – “MAN BITES DOG”, where the attacker (subject) and victim (object) have exchanged roles.  But for that headline to work in a language like this one, reordering the words wouldn't be enough – you'd also need to put the nouns in the right cases and make sure the verb has the right agreement with the subject of the sentence: kua saiók ilunsu, “a man bites a dog”.  This shouldn't seem too unfamiliar – after all, it's very like the way English pronouns behave (“I love her”/“she loves me”), but applied to nouns as well.

A side‐effect of this extra marking is that it's often possible to emphasise an object noun by pulling it to the start of the clause: saiók kua ilunsu is “a man bites a dog!”  The lack of ·da and ·es endings keeps it quite clear who did the biting.

This is the default case, used for the main participant in the events being described.  Since verbs in this language carry pronoun‐suffixes (VIc), subject pronouns like “I” (pa) are normally left out as redundant; which means the sentence can end up containing nothing but a verb.  Contrariwise, there can be surprisingly many subject nouns in sentences like “the king looks an idiot” or “my brother became his apprentice”, where the noun after the verb is a second subject, not an object – see VIIIc on “linking verbs”.
The participant directly affected by the events denoted by the verb.  In English only pronouns carry visible object‐case marking (“I” is subject, “me” is object), but here it can happen to any epicene‐gender noun.  Not all sentences involve an object; intransitive verbs (e.g. “I spoke” – see VIIIb) only have a subject, and in this language reflexives (e.g. “I saw myself”, where the subject is also the object – VIIId) are treated as a special kind of intransitive.
The equivalent of the English “indirect object”, used with postpositions (Vc).  Don't be confused by the way English seems to put two objects into sentences like “he gave the king a horse” – that's really “he (subject) gave a horse (object) to the king (oblique)”: kéntha ji·da u fáru.

Classicists might prefer the labels “Nominative”, “Accusative”, and “Dative” for these cases, but I'm avoiding them because they're less widely understood.

IVc – Regular Nouns

Nouns do not normally show any sign of being singular or plural (see IIIa), and there are no “articles”; the noun ianúr can mean “a leg”, “the leg”, “legs”, or “the legs”.  This vagueness is cheerfully tolerated; the demonstratives “this/that” are available, but they are not normally used as stand‐ins for our articles “a/the”.

What nouns are accompanied by are pronoun‐suffixes which distinguish “my leg(s)” from “your leg(s)”; see VIc.  However, since the third‐person suffix for epicene‐gender agreement is zero, it tends to increase rather than reduce the confusion for English‐speaking learners – ianúr can mean any of “his leg(s)/her leg(s)/their leg(s)” as well as the senses listed above.

Nouns also carry case‐marks which show their role as participants in the action of the sentence, and take the following forms (depending on the noun's gender):

NEUTER: ·  ·  ·(d)on
EPICENE: ·  ·(d)a ·(d)a

These case suffixes are appended to nouns after any pronoun‐suffixes; the d vanishes if the last letter before the suffix is a consonant, except that …m·d… becomes …nd…, …n·d… becomes …nn…, …r·d… becomes …rr…, and …l·d… becomes …ll….  Thus “the king” is ji as subject, ji·da as object/oblique; “our horse(s)” is kéntha·m as subject/object, kéntha·n·don as oblique.

IVd – Irregular Nouns

A glance at the table in the previous section will show that neuter nouns have identical subject and object forms, while epicene nouns have identical object and oblique forms.  However, there are a handful of irregular epicene nouns which behave differently, with special forms for each case.  The only ones still in common use are:

woman: faro·  far·ra faro·da
priest: korto·  korto·ra korto·da
commander: ortothién·  ortothiér·ra ortothién·na

All the other ‐(i)én agentives (see Xa) have vestigial irregular forms in the same pattern as this last.  None of these irregularities persist when pronoun‐suffixes intervene, and they affect only the nouns themselves, not any accompanying adjectives.